Since the last revelation of Allah (Islam) came to human beings, many people who did not accept it tried to bring sensible reasons not to believe. There were none. all the reasons they came up with translated either their ignorance about the revelation, or their effort to deliberately distort it. These efforts are called LIES.
First, what's the definition of a lie? "A lie is the dissimulation or willful deformation of the contents of a thought that the subject deems to be true" (Wikipedia).
Throughout the ages, the same pattern of false facts and distortions came over again and again and again. Fortunately though, brilliant muslim scholars and defenders of the truth answered them one after the other, again and again and again. The truth was therefore never distorted.
"Their intention is to extinguish Allah's Light (by blowing) with their mouths: but Allah will complete (the revelation of) His Light, even though the Unbelievers may detest (it)." [Sura As'Saf (61 ) V.8]
By similarity, all the lies, generalizations, misconceptions, misinterpretations that we hear in the modern era are not driven by people who really seek the truth, but just people whose pride doesn't let them admit the truth (which is the definition of islam = surrender to the truth). so they continually make new LIES.
Now you could say "well, now it's different because we have ultrafast communications and freedom of speech, which means two things:
- The reports made by journalists about muslims, as well as the books issued by experts from fancy universities are reliable, they can't be lies
- Muslims are free to present what they want to public opinion without any bias, and let people judge by themselves
At first it may seem to hold together. but a closer look reveals that:
- High-Tech communication does not mean comprehensive information. In fact, information is filtered at the source way before it reaches the consumer's newspaper or TV
- Freedom of speech doesn't mean "equal of opportunity of speech". Access to providing wide scale information is so vital and strategic that the deciders simply don't let anyone have the same opportunity. This is where delusion plays an important role:
"truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies" (Winston Churchill)
Fortunately, all the lies that have bodygarded the truth have been answered. But because of limited access to public opinion, the answers were not as widespread as the lies. In this post, I will try to gather some of the principal lies and the answers to them. If you have more issues that you consider important I encourage you to add them to this post. I will mainly adress the issues of Islam and violence, Islam and women, Islam and minorities, Islam and Shariaa and Islam and muslims:
Islam is a religion spread by the sword, and the prophet (pbuh) was a warlord
That's the most "fashionable" lie of these days because of terrorism.
Islam was spread by the "word", not the sword. I'll tell you why and how:
The prophet did not fight any offensive war, his actions were DEFENSIVE: I'll give you some examples: (for the sake of concision I put just highlights, but I can give more details if you like, just tell me)
- Battle of Badr: he was going to recuperate the goods of his followers, goods that were taken up by the unbelievers who forced them out of the city of Mecca.
- Battle of Uhud: defensive against the unbelievers of mecca who came with their army to strike him in his city
- Battle of the coalition (Al Ahzab): whereby the city of the prophet (al Medina) was put under siege by a coalition of unbeliever tribes, but they did not succeed to take the city.
- the battles that occured between al Ahzab and the opening of Mecca: they were directed against the tribes which participated in the siege of the coalition. NO OTHER TRIBE WAS TARGETED.
- The battle of Taiif: Against the byzantines who were preparing to attack the north outskirts of muslims' lands. During the long travel to the north, the muslim army passed by numerous non muslim tribes AND ATTACKED NONE.
So in a nutshell, the prophet's battles were strike-backs against the ones who deliberately harmed the muslims.
In Islam, it is a duty to defend oneself against any aggression. and I know no sensible nation or politician that would disagree with that (all nations have armies, even christian nations)
By the way, our christian brothers claim that christianity is a non violent religion. If so, then why are there pastors and preachers in the armies of christian countries today? What do they tell the soldiers? aren't they against war?
Now let's talk about islam after the prophet (pbuh)
Islam spread in all directions, yes there were armies leading the message but there is a VERY IMPORTANT set of facts that should be told here:
- No struggle was engaged, unless the free territory opposed the spreading of the message with force. The best proof about that is the fact that one companion of the prophet, Saad Ibn Abi Waqqas (Allah agrees him), was sent to China to deliver the message of Islam. the Emperor of the Tang dynasty (who ruled China at that time) listened to him and said "What you have brought does not conflict with the teachings of Confucius" and he let him spread the message in China without need of any army of any kind. Even more, he erected a mosque so the muslims can pray. Remains of that mosque are still present TODAY in the south-western part of China.
- The muslim armies were often HELPED OUT BY LOCALS AGAINST THEIR OWN REGIMES (persian, byzantine mostly) because they opressed them by taking high taxes, while muslims only asked them to pay the "protection tax" for protecting them and because they (the locals) had no obligation to join the muslim armies. By the way, the muslim tax was less than 2,5% and only for people who could afford it. People who couldn't afford it were not only exonerated, they were given money from the alms of muslims!
- The muslims NEVER FORCED locals to convert simply because it is forbidden in Islam. ("Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error" [Sura Al Baqara (2) verse 256]). Instead, they handed out the last revelation to them and let them free to chose whether to revert or to keep their original faith. I challenge anyone to bring contrary evidence.
- The muslims did not take the locals' lands, property or wealth. Moreover, If the governor of the area tha has been opened accepted to revert, he was often KEPT IN HIS POSITION. I challenge anyone to give me a similar example in other civilizations. There are simply none.
- Most muslim reverts embraced Islam out of trade and not after city openings. it is the case of all eatern muslims in the indian peninsula, China and south eastern Asia (Malaysia and Indonesia), who constitute THE VAST MAJORITY OF MUSLIMS (over 80%).
Islam spread so quickly and so durably by the power of the WORD, never the sword.
Wherever Islam passed by, it did not wreak havoc, It brought justice and tolerance. That was possible only because of one thing : It is the truth, and no lie can stand beside it.
Islam mistreats women
It's the second most fashionable lie nowadays.
My mother and my sister both wear the Hijab and they never told me that they were mistreated. You may say "well maybe they are exceptions".
Then Why Islam is the fastest growing religion in western countries, and why are most converts FEMALES? (for each male convert to Islam, 4 females convert to Islam in the USA, according the the US sensus bureau)
So let's see what Islam offers to women:
- Women are allowed to marry WHOM THEY WANT, The decision of marriage is theirs. There is no such thing as forced marriage in islam
- They are allowed to divorce (it's called Khul3)
- They are allowed to own property, to have businesses and to work. But the good news are: They are not REQUIRED to work and to bring an income to the house. Their money is THEIRS. While the man is REQUIRED to sustain his family and his money is the family's.
- In Islam, the husband is REQUIRED to make his wife fulfilled at all levels, including his obligation to seek her pleasure and satisfaction.
- The husband is also required to protect her. She has the right to feel protected and treasured.
outside marriage, women are required to wear a non attractive clothing and to wear their veils (Hijabs) for a simple reason: Women are naturally attractive to men. So who would like his wife to attract other men? you know the answer.
In life, you protect the most valuable things you have. In Islam, Women are protected, not exposed. They truly ARE the most valuable thing for muslims. Who can dream of a better religion?
Islam does not tolerate other religions and minorities
let's compare How muslims and Christians dealed with minorities :
Wherever Islam passed by, no one was forced to convert as I said. Moreover, they were treated equally as muslims and were given full rights, including the freedom to practice their religion. The best proof of that is that there are STILL non muslim minorities that remained
intact for centuries till the present day (in egypt, in the middle east and in south eastern Asia). some of them even speak their native languages.
Christians forced conversions of jews in the middle ages and forced muslims in Andalucia (now Spain) not to pray, not to take baths (because they were the only ones taking baths) and to eat
pork! Shortly after, the remaining muslims AND JEWS living in spain were massacred, despite the promises of protection given to the fallen muslim governors! This is a historical fact that no historian can deny. this fact is passed under silence of course.
Talking about jews, jews were never massacred by muslims, the golden age of jews was never judeo-christian, it was Judeo-muslim.
No Comment
Islam is against science and technology
Islam is the ONLY religion that ENCOURAGED science and technology instead of fearing it.
In islam, more science leads to more faith, simply because everything in islam holds together and makes sense. During the era of islam, many new disciplines of science were founded. The first hospitals in the world were muslims' (of course medicine student are not told that, the first discovery of the roundness of earth was muslim, Algebra was founded, digits were invented (123456789), the zero (0) was invented (of course, math students don't know that), Sociology was founded (by Ibn Khaldoon, of course sociology students are not told that), the first accurate maps were drawn, and the list goes by..
In fact, Islam put science at a level so prestigious that without islam, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO WESTERN RENAISSANCE
These facts that no historian can deny are totally passed under silence. Because if they were taught to students, it will not drive the picture of islam as a barbarian religion.
The shariaa is an scandalous rigid middle-age-like jurisdiction
Shariaa is a word that means the rules that a believer follows. it's a generic word that can be applied to any religion. so it's more accurate to say "the islamic shariaa".
It is often claimed that the shariaa is harsh and cruel, and give examples such as cutting the stealer's hand etc. What they "forget" to mention is that IN THE FIRST 400 YEARS OF ISLAM, ONLY 6 HANDS WERE CUT! Who can claim a better security and a lower crime rate?
apart from that, almost nothing is told about the islamic shariaa, like the protection of the poor's rights by the alms, the protection of the orphan's rights by tutorship, the regulation of trade by forbidding false bidding and deceitful buys, the protection of society by forbidding gambling, alcohol, unmarried relations and affairs.
The islamic shariaa is therefore a comprehensive and fair system. Moreover, it's an OPEN SYSTEM: to any new issue there are general rules to follow and scholars are required to find the most appropriate solution to specific problems in specific times or places. So the
islamic shariaa has JURISPRUDENCE, always seeking the best and most equal solution. Who can design better? Who but our creator..
Muslims are just people from the third world who are stubborn, uneducated, corrupted and stuck in the middle ages.
Sorry to disappoint some of you, but this is not a total lie. there is some truth in this last allegation. In fact it is the reason why muslims DO NOT REPRESENT ISLAM (except a few).
The more they got away from the straight path, the more they became just people like others, prone to corruption and deterioration.
Therefore, our goal as "people who claim to be muslims" is firstand foremost to BE GOOD MUSLIMS, and then, and only then, to show the world what is true Islam.
First, what's the definition of a lie? "A lie is the dissimulation or willful deformation of the contents of a thought that the subject deems to be true" (Wikipedia).
Throughout the ages, the same pattern of false facts and distortions came over again and again and again. Fortunately though, brilliant muslim scholars and defenders of the truth answered them one after the other, again and again and again. The truth was therefore never distorted.
"Their intention is to extinguish Allah's Light (by blowing) with their mouths: but Allah will complete (the revelation of) His Light, even though the Unbelievers may detest (it)." [Sura As'Saf (61 ) V.8]
By similarity, all the lies, generalizations, misconceptions, misinterpretations that we hear in the modern era are not driven by people who really seek the truth, but just people whose pride doesn't let them admit the truth (which is the definition of islam = surrender to the truth). so they continually make new LIES.
Now you could say "well, now it's different because we have ultrafast communications and freedom of speech, which means two things:
- The reports made by journalists about muslims, as well as the books issued by experts from fancy universities are reliable, they can't be lies
- Muslims are free to present what they want to public opinion without any bias, and let people judge by themselves
At first it may seem to hold together. but a closer look reveals that:
- High-Tech communication does not mean comprehensive information. In fact, information is filtered at the source way before it reaches the consumer's newspaper or TV
- Freedom of speech doesn't mean "equal of opportunity of speech". Access to providing wide scale information is so vital and strategic that the deciders simply don't let anyone have the same opportunity. This is where delusion plays an important role:
"truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies" (Winston Churchill)
Fortunately, all the lies that have bodygarded the truth have been answered. But because of limited access to public opinion, the answers were not as widespread as the lies. In this post, I will try to gather some of the principal lies and the answers to them. If you have more issues that you consider important I encourage you to add them to this post. I will mainly adress the issues of Islam and violence, Islam and women, Islam and minorities, Islam and Shariaa and Islam and muslims:
Islam is a religion spread by the sword, and the prophet (pbuh) was a warlord
That's the most "fashionable" lie of these days because of terrorism.
Islam was spread by the "word", not the sword. I'll tell you why and how:
The prophet did not fight any offensive war, his actions were DEFENSIVE: I'll give you some examples: (for the sake of concision I put just highlights, but I can give more details if you like, just tell me)
- Battle of Badr: he was going to recuperate the goods of his followers, goods that were taken up by the unbelievers who forced them out of the city of Mecca.
- Battle of Uhud: defensive against the unbelievers of mecca who came with their army to strike him in his city
- Battle of the coalition (Al Ahzab): whereby the city of the prophet (al Medina) was put under siege by a coalition of unbeliever tribes, but they did not succeed to take the city.
- the battles that occured between al Ahzab and the opening of Mecca: they were directed against the tribes which participated in the siege of the coalition. NO OTHER TRIBE WAS TARGETED.
- The battle of Taiif: Against the byzantines who were preparing to attack the north outskirts of muslims' lands. During the long travel to the north, the muslim army passed by numerous non muslim tribes AND ATTACKED NONE.
So in a nutshell, the prophet's battles were strike-backs against the ones who deliberately harmed the muslims.
In Islam, it is a duty to defend oneself against any aggression. and I know no sensible nation or politician that would disagree with that (all nations have armies, even christian nations)
By the way, our christian brothers claim that christianity is a non violent religion. If so, then why are there pastors and preachers in the armies of christian countries today? What do they tell the soldiers? aren't they against war?
Now let's talk about islam after the prophet (pbuh)
Islam spread in all directions, yes there were armies leading the message but there is a VERY IMPORTANT set of facts that should be told here:
- No struggle was engaged, unless the free territory opposed the spreading of the message with force. The best proof about that is the fact that one companion of the prophet, Saad Ibn Abi Waqqas (Allah agrees him), was sent to China to deliver the message of Islam. the Emperor of the Tang dynasty (who ruled China at that time) listened to him and said "What you have brought does not conflict with the teachings of Confucius" and he let him spread the message in China without need of any army of any kind. Even more, he erected a mosque so the muslims can pray. Remains of that mosque are still present TODAY in the south-western part of China.
- The muslim armies were often HELPED OUT BY LOCALS AGAINST THEIR OWN REGIMES (persian, byzantine mostly) because they opressed them by taking high taxes, while muslims only asked them to pay the "protection tax" for protecting them and because they (the locals) had no obligation to join the muslim armies. By the way, the muslim tax was less than 2,5% and only for people who could afford it. People who couldn't afford it were not only exonerated, they were given money from the alms of muslims!
- The muslims NEVER FORCED locals to convert simply because it is forbidden in Islam. ("Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error" [Sura Al Baqara (2) verse 256]). Instead, they handed out the last revelation to them and let them free to chose whether to revert or to keep their original faith. I challenge anyone to bring contrary evidence.
- The muslims did not take the locals' lands, property or wealth. Moreover, If the governor of the area tha has been opened accepted to revert, he was often KEPT IN HIS POSITION. I challenge anyone to give me a similar example in other civilizations. There are simply none.
- Most muslim reverts embraced Islam out of trade and not after city openings. it is the case of all eatern muslims in the indian peninsula, China and south eastern Asia (Malaysia and Indonesia), who constitute THE VAST MAJORITY OF MUSLIMS (over 80%).
Islam spread so quickly and so durably by the power of the WORD, never the sword.
Wherever Islam passed by, it did not wreak havoc, It brought justice and tolerance. That was possible only because of one thing : It is the truth, and no lie can stand beside it.
Islam mistreats women
It's the second most fashionable lie nowadays.
My mother and my sister both wear the Hijab and they never told me that they were mistreated. You may say "well maybe they are exceptions".
Then Why Islam is the fastest growing religion in western countries, and why are most converts FEMALES? (for each male convert to Islam, 4 females convert to Islam in the USA, according the the US sensus bureau)
So let's see what Islam offers to women:
- Women are allowed to marry WHOM THEY WANT, The decision of marriage is theirs. There is no such thing as forced marriage in islam
- They are allowed to divorce (it's called Khul3)
- They are allowed to own property, to have businesses and to work. But the good news are: They are not REQUIRED to work and to bring an income to the house. Their money is THEIRS. While the man is REQUIRED to sustain his family and his money is the family's.
- In Islam, the husband is REQUIRED to make his wife fulfilled at all levels, including his obligation to seek her pleasure and satisfaction.
- The husband is also required to protect her. She has the right to feel protected and treasured.
outside marriage, women are required to wear a non attractive clothing and to wear their veils (Hijabs) for a simple reason: Women are naturally attractive to men. So who would like his wife to attract other men? you know the answer.
In life, you protect the most valuable things you have. In Islam, Women are protected, not exposed. They truly ARE the most valuable thing for muslims. Who can dream of a better religion?
Islam does not tolerate other religions and minorities
let's compare How muslims and Christians dealed with minorities :
Wherever Islam passed by, no one was forced to convert as I said. Moreover, they were treated equally as muslims and were given full rights, including the freedom to practice their religion. The best proof of that is that there are STILL non muslim minorities that remained
intact for centuries till the present day (in egypt, in the middle east and in south eastern Asia). some of them even speak their native languages.
Christians forced conversions of jews in the middle ages and forced muslims in Andalucia (now Spain) not to pray, not to take baths (because they were the only ones taking baths) and to eat
pork! Shortly after, the remaining muslims AND JEWS living in spain were massacred, despite the promises of protection given to the fallen muslim governors! This is a historical fact that no historian can deny. this fact is passed under silence of course.
Talking about jews, jews were never massacred by muslims, the golden age of jews was never judeo-christian, it was Judeo-muslim.
No Comment
Islam is against science and technology
Islam is the ONLY religion that ENCOURAGED science and technology instead of fearing it.
In islam, more science leads to more faith, simply because everything in islam holds together and makes sense. During the era of islam, many new disciplines of science were founded. The first hospitals in the world were muslims' (of course medicine student are not told that, the first discovery of the roundness of earth was muslim, Algebra was founded, digits were invented (123456789), the zero (0) was invented (of course, math students don't know that), Sociology was founded (by Ibn Khaldoon, of course sociology students are not told that), the first accurate maps were drawn, and the list goes by..
In fact, Islam put science at a level so prestigious that without islam, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO WESTERN RENAISSANCE
These facts that no historian can deny are totally passed under silence. Because if they were taught to students, it will not drive the picture of islam as a barbarian religion.
The shariaa is an scandalous rigid middle-age-like jurisdiction
Shariaa is a word that means the rules that a believer follows. it's a generic word that can be applied to any religion. so it's more accurate to say "the islamic shariaa".
It is often claimed that the shariaa is harsh and cruel, and give examples such as cutting the stealer's hand etc. What they "forget" to mention is that IN THE FIRST 400 YEARS OF ISLAM, ONLY 6 HANDS WERE CUT! Who can claim a better security and a lower crime rate?
apart from that, almost nothing is told about the islamic shariaa, like the protection of the poor's rights by the alms, the protection of the orphan's rights by tutorship, the regulation of trade by forbidding false bidding and deceitful buys, the protection of society by forbidding gambling, alcohol, unmarried relations and affairs.
The islamic shariaa is therefore a comprehensive and fair system. Moreover, it's an OPEN SYSTEM: to any new issue there are general rules to follow and scholars are required to find the most appropriate solution to specific problems in specific times or places. So the
islamic shariaa has JURISPRUDENCE, always seeking the best and most equal solution. Who can design better? Who but our creator..
Muslims are just people from the third world who are stubborn, uneducated, corrupted and stuck in the middle ages.
Sorry to disappoint some of you, but this is not a total lie. there is some truth in this last allegation. In fact it is the reason why muslims DO NOT REPRESENT ISLAM (except a few).
The more they got away from the straight path, the more they became just people like others, prone to corruption and deterioration.
Therefore, our goal as "people who claim to be muslims" is firstand foremost to BE GOOD MUSLIMS, and then, and only then, to show the world what is true Islam.
-small.jpg)





